Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near W5 2JN

Westridge Court 32 Park Hill London W5 2JN

LON/00AJ/LDC/2024/0648 · dispensation from consultation · Ealing · decided 20 Mar 2025

The tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent lift works at the block, as the lift is needed by elderly residents.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordWestridge Court Residents Association Limited
Management companyWestridge Court Residents Association Limited
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputeother
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
The application describes the Property as a purpose built block of twelve flats.
freeholder
Applicant: Westridge Court Residents Association Limited (freeholder)
outcome
The Tribunal grants the application for dispensation
s20
The Tribunal grants the application for dispensation (which it believes to be retrospective from the limited evidence before it) in respect of the subject works (‘the works’), namely works to the lift at the Property.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.