Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near YO26 4ZP

Westgate Apartments, Leeman Road, York, YO26 4ZP

MAN/00FF/LSC/2018/0056 · service charges · York · decided 16 Aug 2019

The tribunal found that £370.92 of reserve fund charges for 2012 to 2017 were unreasonably incurred, ordered reimbursement of that sum with the £100 application fee, and made a section 20C order.

OutcomeReduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Order made
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordWestgate (York) Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block
Service charge years in dispute2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017
Items in disputereserve fund
Items disallowed or reducedreserve fund
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderedthe respondent to refund the application fee of £100

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
Respondent : [name] (York) Limited
years
the Reserve Accounts for the years 2012 -2017
outcome
have, to the extent alleged by Mr [name] (£370.92 in total), been unreasonably incurred.
items reduced
have, to the extent alleged by Mr [name] (£370.92 in total), been unreasonably incurred.
s20c
shall not, pursuant to Section 20C, be relevant costs in any service charge
costs
the sum of £100 refund of the application fee paid by Mr [name]

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.