Wesley Court, Park View, Yeadon, LS19 7HZ
MAN/00DA/LDC/2023/0075 · dispensation from consultation · Leeds · decided 18 Mar 2024
The tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for the chimney repair works at Wesley Court, as the leaseholders were not shown to have been prejudiced.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | J H Watson Ground Rent Investments Ltd (Wesley Court) |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 11 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property is a converted vicarage comprising of 11 private dwellings spread over 2 floors.
- freeholder
The application was made on behalf of JH [name] Rent Investments Ltd (Wesley House), the landlord of Wesley Court
- outcome
dispensation is therefore granted.
- s20
Compliance with the consultation requirements of section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 is dispensed with in relation to the chimney repair works at the Property.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.