Waterside Apartments, St James’ Court, West Accrington BB5 1NA

MAN/30UG/LSC/2021/0044 · service charges · Hyndburn · decided 11 Sep 2023

The tribunal found that the waking watch charges incurred while complying with the fire safety enforcement notice were recoverable under the leases and reasonably incurred in the amount claimed, though the section 20C application remained outstanding.

Outcome	Payable as demanded
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Not clear
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Landlord or management company
Freeholder / landlord	Adriatic Land 3 Limited
Management company	none named
Managing agent	RMG Limited
Building	A block, 55 flats
Service charge years in dispute	2019, 2020
Items in dispute	other
Items disallowed or reduced	none stated
Total demanded	not stated as one figure
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	none stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n: against the respondent residential leaseholders of 55 flats within the building
freeholder: Applicants : [name] 3 Limited
agent: a proposed change in managing agents from Urban Bubble to RMG Limited
outcome: The waking watch charges for the service charge years in question are recoverable under the terms of the leases of the apartments in the amount claimed by the Applicants

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.