Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near MK9 2FN

Vizion, Avebury Boulevard, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire MK9 2FN

CAM/00MG/LRM/2025/0003 · right to manage · Milton Keynes · decided 15 Dec 2025

The tribunal dismissed the right to manage application because the building was excluded from the right to manage on the relevant date, as non-residential parts then exceeded the 25% limit in force at the time.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedRTM company
Freeholder / landlordAvon Ground Rents Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 381 flats
Service charge years in dispute2024
Items in disputenot stated
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
The property consists of 381 flats with commercial premises on the ground floor and underground parking.
freeholder
Respondent : Avon Ground Rents Limited
outcome
The application is dismissed as the property was excluded from the Right to Manage on the relevant date due to the non-residential parts exceeding 25% of the internal floor area (the limit in force at the time).

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

Later rulings on the same case (costs, section 20C, permission to appeal): 28 Apr 2026.

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.