Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Search

Vista Tower, Southgate House, Southgate, Stevenage SG1 1H

CAM/26UH/LDC/2022/0036 · dispensation from consultation · Stevenage · decided 31 Jan 2023

No plain-English summary for this decision yet. See the original.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Order made
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordGrey GR Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentJ B Leitch Limited
BuildingA block, 73 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputeother
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
The Applicant’s Statement of Case states that the block incorporates 73
agent
the applicant landlord, represented by J B Leitch Limited
outcome
The tribunal determines under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (the “1985 Act”) to dispense with all the consultation requirements in relation to the internal fire compartmentation works
s20c
The tribunal orders under section 20C of the 1985 Act that all the costs incurred by the applicant in connection with these proceedings are not to be regarded as relevant costs
s20
to dispense with all the consultation requirements in relation to the internal fire compartmentation works

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.