Viridian Apartments, 75 Battersea Park Road, London SW8 4DG
LON/00BJ/LSC/2024/0256 · service charges · Wandsworth · decided 7 Jul 2025
The tribunal decided the leases do not allow the head tenant to recover Development-wide costs from the leaseholders, so concierge and other Development-only costs are not payable, management fees are reduced, and no landlord costs may be added to the service charge.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Notting Hill Genesis Housing Association |
| Management company | Viridian Residents Management Co Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 38 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, major works, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | management fees, other |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The 38 self-contained flats (not including the balconies/terraces).
- freeholder
(1) Notting Hill Genesis Housing Association*
- outcome
the tribunal determines the management fees should be reduced appropriately for all of the years in dispute to reflect the limited services provided.
- items reduced
the tribunal determines the management fees should be reduced appropriately for all of the years in dispute to reflect the limited services provided.
- s20c
the tribunal considers it reasonable and appropriate to make the orders sought under s. 20 of the 1985 Act and para 5A of [name] 11 of the 2002 so that none of the first respondent’s costs are added to the service charges
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.