Vineyard Heights, 30 Mortlake High Street, London, SW14 8HX
LON/00BD/LDC/2019/0110 · dispensation from consultation · Richmond upon Thames · decided 12 Aug 2019
The tribunal granted dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for the installation of a temporary wireless alarm system to replace the waking watch, but made no determination on the ongoing waking watch costs, which must be the subject of a separate application.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Glenstone Properties Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
the Property comprises a block of thirty-one apartments
- outcome
the Tribunal determines, pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, that it is reasonable in all the circumstances to dispense with the statutory consultation requirements in respect of the Work.
- s20
the Tribunal determines, pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, that it is reasonable in all the circumstances to dispense with the statutory consultation requirements in respect of the Work.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.