Village Court, Town Street, Duffield, DE56 4EG
BIR/17UB/LDC/2025/0009 · dispensation from consultation · Amber Valley · decided 13 May 2026
The tribunal granted the landlord retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent roof replacement works at Village Court, as no leaseholder objected or claimed prejudice.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Places for People Living + Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Residential Management Group Ltd |
| Building | A block, 18 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property comprises (according to the Applicant) 18 maisonettes
- freeholder
Applicant : [name] for People Living + Ltd
- agent
Representative : Residential Management Group Ltd
- outcome
We determine that the Application is granted.
- s20
We determine that the Application is granted. The Applicant may dispense with the consultation requirements contained in section 20 of the Act in respect of the carrying out of the Works.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.