Viewpoint, 7 & 9 Sandbourne Road, Bournemouth, BH4 8JP
CHI/00HN/LIS/2018/0065 · LIS · Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole · decided 10 May 2019
figures not yet checkedOn an application for a determination of proposed works, the tribunal found that if the roof renewal, brickwork movement-joint repairs and tank and fan renewal are carried out to the specifications and reasonably, their cost may be recovered as service charge, while the balcony works were stayed for six months because there was insufficient information.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Viewpoint Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Napier Management Services Limited |
| Building | An estate |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : Viewpoint Limited
- agent
the Applicant’s managing agents Napier Management Services Limited
- outcome
The Applicant’s application in respect of proposed works to the balcony weatherproofing / concrete repairs is stayed for a period of six months
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.