Victory Apartments, 165 Union Street, Oldham, OL1 1TD

MAN/00BP/LDC/2020/0007 · dispensation from consultation · Oldham · decided 9 Dec 2020

The tribunal granted the RTM company dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent installation of a full fire alarm system at Victory Apartments, though this does not mean the resulting service charge is reasonable.

Outcome	Other decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Not applied for
Section 20 consultation	Dispensation granted
Who applied	RTM company
Freeholder / landlord	not a company, or not stated
Management company	The Victory RTM Company Limited
Managing agent	none named
Building	A block, 32 flats
Service charge years in dispute	not stated
Items in dispute	other
Items disallowed or reduced	none stated
Total demanded	not stated as one figure
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	none stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n: comprising 32 residential apartments and
management company: The Victory RTM Company Limited applies to the Tribunal under Section 20ZA
outcome: We conclude it reasonable in accordance with Section 20ZA(1) of the Act to dispense with the consultation requirements
s20: Dispensation from consultation requirements does not imply that the resulting service charge is reasonable.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.