Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near LE16 7XA

Various Properties situated at Roman Gardens Symington Way Market Harborough LE16 7XA

BIR/31UD/LDC/2025/0035 · dispensation from consultation · Harborough · decided 13 Mar 2026

The Tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for digital telecare alarm upgrade works carried out at Roman Gardens between December 2023 and spring 2024, finding no prejudice to leaseholders, though leaseholders can still challenge the costs under section 27A.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordEMH Housing and Regeneration Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingAn estate, 14 flats
Service charge years in dispute2023, 2024
Items in disputeother
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
consists of 23 bungalows and 14 flats
freeholder
Applicant : EMH Housing and Regeneration Limited
years
between 8th December 2023 and Spring 2024
outcome
The Tribunal is satisfied it is reasonable to dispense with the Consultation Requirements
s20
the Tribunal dispenses with the obligation to carry out consultation

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.