Various Properties on Kingswood Estate

LON/00BE/LSC/2024/0156 · service charges · Camden · decided 10 Apr 2026

figures not yet checked

The tribunal largely found the Kingswood Estate major works payable by leaseholders, but reduced the communal lighting charge by the cost of emergency lighting and made a partial section 20C order limiting the landlord's costs recoverable through the service charge to 50%.

Outcome	Reduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Order made
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Leaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlord	not a company, or not stated
Management company	none named
Managing agent	none named
Building	An estate
Service charge years in dispute	2018
Items in dispute	insurance, major works, other, repairs and maintenance, utilities
Items disallowed or reduced	major works, utilities
Total demanded	not stated as one figure
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	none stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

years: Kingswood Estate QHIP 2018/19 Major Works Contract
outcome: The tribunal finds the remaining costs of these works are within clause 4(2) of the lease and are reasonable and payable by the leaseholders.
items reduced: the tribunal also finds the works were excessive in their scope
s20c: the tribunal determines that it is just and equitable in the circumstances for an order to be made under section 20C of the 1985 Act

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.