Various Properties in the ownership of Midland Heart Ltd as Landlord
BIR/00CN/LDC/2024/0018 · dispensation from consultation · Birmingham · decided 13 Dec 2024
The tribunal granted the landlord's application to dispense with the section 20 consultation requirements for a long term insurance agreement with Marsh, on condition that the landlord does not seek its costs of the application from any leaseholder.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Midland Heart Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | An estate |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2022, 2023 |
| Items in dispute | insurance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | dispensation conditional on the applicant not seeking any of its costs of the application from any respondent |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Midland Heart Ltd as Landlord
- outcome
We determine that the Application is granted.
- s20
The Applicant may dispense with the consultation requirements contained in section 20 of the Act in respect of the entering into of a long term qualifying agreement with Marsh for insurance services.
- costs
conditional upon the Applicant not seeking any of its costs of the Application from any Respondent
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.