Various Properties at Roffo and Aylesbury Estate
LON/00BE/LDC/2024/0231 · dispensation from consultation · Southwark · decided 12 May 2025
The tribunal dispensed with the statutory consultation requirements for the replacement of heating and hot water pipework, and ordered that the landlord's costs of the tribunal application cannot be added to the service charge.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | London and Quadrant Housing Trust |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | An estate |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2023 |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : London and Quadrant Housing Trust
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that it is reasonable for the Applicant to dispense with the consultation requirements in relation to the works
- s20c
The Tribunal makes an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 so that none of the landlord’s costs of the Tribunal proceedings may be passed to the lessees through any service charge.
- s20
The Applicant had not complied with the consultation requirements.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.