Various Poplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Limited properties in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets as listed in the application
LON/00BG/LDC/2023/0234 · dispensation from consultation · Tower Hamlets · decided 29 Jan 2024
The tribunal granted Poplar HARCA prospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for its qualifying long-term agreements for the supply of gas and electricity, to the extent not already complied with, but did not decide whether any energy charges are reasonable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Community Association Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- outcome
The Tribunal dispenses with the consultation requirements in respect of the qualifying long-term agreements which are the subject of this application
- s20
The Tribunal dispenses with the consultation requirements in respect of the qualifying long-term agreements which are the subject of this application
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
This decision replaces an earlier one for the same case: 29 Jan 2024.
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.