Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near SO14 3JE

Various flats at Sirocco, 33 Channel Way, Southampton, Hampshire SO14 3JE

CHI/00MS/LSC/2021/0023 · service charges · Southampton · decided 30 May 2022

figures not yet checked

The tribunal found that the special contribution demands for Thomason Consulting engineers' fees were reasonable and payable by the leaseholders, and refused a section 20C order.

OutcomePayable as demanded
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Refused
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordZonemeadow Ltd
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 34 flats
Service charge years in dispute2020
Items in disputelegal and professional fees, other
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
Respondent : Zonemeadow Ltd
years
no provision had been made in the budget for the 2020 service charge year
outcome
we find that the demands issued by the Respondent for special contributions to leaseholders are reasonable and that they are liable to pay the same.
s20c
we are satisfied that no order should be made.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.