Various Flats at Salisbury House, 23 Highbury Corner, London, N5 1RB
LON/00AU/LSC/2019/0118 · service charges · Islington · decided 25 Jun 2019
The tribunal found that most of the landlord's handover costs for the right to manage were not reasonably incurred, allowing it to recover only £2,840 plus £255 disbursements plus VAT through the service charge, and left the section 20C and paragraph 5A applications in abeyance.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Salisbury House (Highbury Corner) RTM Company Ltd |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 20 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | other |
| Total demanded | £7,534.80 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Salisbury House is a block of 20 flats facing Holloway Road
- management company
They formed an RTM company, Salisbury House (Highbury Corner) RTM Company Ltd.
- outcome
Costs of £2,840 plus disbursements of £255 plus VAT were reasonably incurred
- items reduced
Costs of £2,840 plus disbursements of £255 plus VAT were reasonably incurred
- total demanded
total costs of £7,534.80 incurred by the landlord
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.