Various flats at Matthias Court, Richmond, TW10 6LL

LON/00BD/LDC/2019/0237 · dispensation from consultation · Richmond upon Thames · decided 11 Sep 2019

figures not yet checked

The tribunal found the respondent entitled to collect a £30,000 reserve fund for 2019 under the lease, dismissing the leaseholder's challenge, and refused the section 20C application.

Outcome	Dismissed or struck out
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Refused
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Leaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlord	Matthias Court Freehold Company
Management company	Mathias Court Management Co Ltd
Managing agent	JCF Property Management
Building	A block, 11 flats
Service charge years in dispute	2019
Items in dispute	reserve fund
Items disallowed or reduced	none stated
Total demanded	£30,000
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	none stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n: each block containing 11 flats all held on long leases
freeholder: made between Matthias Court Freehold Company and Matthias Court Management Company
management company: Respondent : Mathias Court Management Co Ltd
agent: Representative : JCF Property Management
years: the service charge year 2019/2020
outcome: The tribunal therefore dismisses the application.
total demanded: a Reserve Fund in the sum of £30,000 as demanded
s20c: In light of the tribunal’s decision the tribunal refuses this application

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.