Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near TW11 8HU

Various Flats at Langham Mews, 170 High Street, Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 8HU

· other · Richmond upon Thames · decided 8 Feb 2021

No plain-English summary for this decision yet. See the original.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordBDW Trading Limited
Management companyLangham Mews Management Company Limited
Managing agentBroadoak Management Limited
BuildingA block, 10 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
The building in question comprises a ground floor restaurant with 10 residential flats on the upper floors.
management company
Langham Mews Management Company Limited (“LM”) is a management company whose members and directors are either leaseholders of one of the flats or a freeholder of one of the houses.
agent
LM has taken responsibility for management via its managing agent Broadoak Management Limited
outcome
The order shall continue for a period of 4 years, expiring on 7th February 2025.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.