Various Blocks in Waterside Way, London, N17 9GE
LON/00AP/LDC/2020/0142 · dispensation from consultation · Haringey · decided 11 Feb 2021
The tribunal granted dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for emergency fire safety works (waking watch and fire alarm installation) and found all the service charges demanded for those works and the associated legal fees payable in full.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Hale Village Estates Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance, legal and professional fees, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : Hale Village Estates Limited
- outcome
the tribunal determines that the service charges for the properties are payable as follows, namely, that all service charges as demanded are payable
- s20
The Tribunal grants the application for the dispensation of all or any of the consultation requirements provided for by section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.