Vandon Court, Petty France, London, SW1H 9HE
LON/00BK/LDC/2026/0093 · dispensation from consultation · Westminster · decided 2 Sep 2026
The Tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for the fire compartment works and waking watch carried out after a fire risk assessment at Vandon Court, but this does not decide whether the charges are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Vandon Court Freehold Limited |
| Management company | Encore Estate Management Limited |
| Managing agent | Encore Estate Management Limited |
| Building | A block, 91 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The building contains 91 self-contained flats.
- freeholder
Applicant : Vandon Court Freehold Limited
- agent
Encore Estate Management Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the application for the dispensation of all or any of the consultation requirements
- s20
The Tribunal grants the application for the dispensation of all or any of the consultation requirements
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.