Units 16, 17 & 18 Trench Lock 3, Sommerfield Road, Telford TF1 5ST
BIR/00GF/LIS/2019/0021 · LIS · Telford and Wrekin · decided 20 Jun 2019
The tribunal held that the landlord could not recover the cost of gate automation or manned guarding under the leases, dismissed the claims against the first and second defendants, and ordered the third defendant to pay £1710 with court fee and interest.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Trench Lock Telford LLP |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | An estate, 35 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2016 |
| Items in dispute | other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | other |
| Total demanded | £1,100 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the third defendant to pay the applicant court fee £205 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
which comprises 35 industrial units
- freeholder
The Claimant is the freeholder of a commercial development known as Trench Lock
- years
relate to a balancing charge incurred for service charge year ending 31st December 2016
- outcome
The Third Defendant shall pay to the Claimant the sum of £1710
- items reduced
I find that the sweeping up clause does not cover those costs.
- costs
The Claimant is entitled to Court Fee of £205
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.