Unit 3, 3 Benwell Road, London, N7 7AY
LON/00AU/LSC/2022/0020 · service charges · Islington · decided 31 Aug 2022
The tribunal found the respondent liable for the £616.60 interim service charge and for £3,240 of debt recovery administration charges, plus 10% contractual interest and legal costs of £8,197.50.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Urang Property Management Limited |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2012, 2013 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, legal and professional fees, management fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to pay the applicant's costs summarily assessed at £8,197.50 including VAT and disbursements |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- agent
Urang Property Management Limited (“Urang”), which is the managing agent for the property.
- years
Urang issued an interim service charge demand to the Respondent dated 26 February 2013 for the sum of £616.60 in respect of the period 1 October 2012 to 31 March 2013
- outcome
Accordingly, the sum of £3240.00 is payable by the Respondent.
- costs
The total costs payable by the Respondent is £8,197.50.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.