Unit 107, Trivelles, Waterhall Country House,Prestwood Lane, Ifield, Crawley, West Sussex,RH11 0LA
HAV/45UF/LSC/2025/0660 · service charges · Horsham · decided 9 Dec 2025
The tribunal found the service charge demands for 2022 to 2025 issued by Donald Fletcher Ltd valid, reasonable and payable by the applicant, and declined to make a section 20C order.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Trivelles Waterhall Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Donald Fletcher Ltd |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, management fees, other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
The Respondent is ‘Trivelles Waterhall Ltd’.
- agent
Donald Fletcher Ltd in conjunction with Large Hospitality Ltd have the authority to manage and to collect service charges at the Building.
- years
2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025.
- outcome
To that end the Tribunal determines the service charge demands for the years 2022 – 2025 with respect to the property issued by Donald Fletcher Ltd are valid.
- s20c
The Tribunal accepts the Applicant’s section 20C application and declines to make an order for costs.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.