Tytherington Court, Tytherington Park Road, Macclesfield, SK10 2EJ
MAN/00EQ/LSC/2019/0001 · service charges · Cheshire East · decided 7 May 2019
The tribunal found the insurance premiums were reasonably incurred, rejecting the leaseholder's challenge based on a revaluation, and declined to order repayment of the £600 revaluation cost.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | RG Securities (N0 2) Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2013 |
| Items in dispute | insurance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- management company
the Respondent is the management company having responsibility for providing the insurance cover to the development
- years
The Applicant disputes the reasonableness of the insurance premiums paid from 2013 onwards
- outcome
The insurance premiums under consideration by the Tribunal are reasonably incurred.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.