Two Hyde Park Square, London, W2 2JY
LON/00BK/LDC/2021/0069 · dispensation from consultation · Westminster · decided 14 Jun 2021
The tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent repairs to the communal air-conditioning/heating system at the building, with no terms imposed, while leaving payability of the costs open for separate determination.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | London Residential Management Company Limited |
| Building | A block, 36 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property is a converted nine-storey building containing 36 flats, all
- agent
The Property is managed by London Residential Management Company Limited (‘LRM’).
- outcome
The Tribunal grants retrospective dispensation under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The Tribunal grants retrospective dispensation for the repair of the communal air-conditioning/heating system, as detailed in Curaim’s invoice.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.