Trotsworth Court, Christchurch Road, Virginia Water, Egham GU25 4AG
CHI/43UG/LVT/2023/0008 · LVT · Runnymede · decided 12 Jul 2024
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal varied the occupational leases of the 78 flats at Trotsworth Court under section 37 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987, as set out in Appendix A, after finding the threshold consent condition was met and the variations could not be achieved without varying all leases to the same effect.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Trotsworth Court Association Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 78 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance, repairs and maintenance, cleaning and grounds, reserve fund, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | insurance, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The application relates to some 78 flats arranged in nine blocks at Trotsworth Court
- freeholder
Applicant : Trotsworth Court Association Limited
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.