Trinity Court, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester, M15 6AR
MAN/00BN/LDC/2021/0075 · dispensation from consultation · Manchester · decided 5 May 2022
The tribunal dispensed with the section 20 consultation requirements for fire-safety cladding and related works at Trinity Court, finding it reasonable because consultation would delay the works, and expressed no view on cost or payability.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Premier Estates Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 57 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising a 10 storey building with 57 residential apartments
- freeholder
Their immediate landlord is currently Landmark (Bolton) Limited.
- management company
The Applicant is the management company for the Property
- outcome
the tribunal makes a determination under section 20ZA of the Act to dispense with the requirement to consult
- s20
the tribunal makes a determination under section 20ZA of the Act to dispense with the requirement to consult
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.