Tradewinds 127 Lawrence Street, York, YO10 3EG
MAN/00FF/LDC/2025/0607 · dispensation from consultation · York · decided 9 Jun 2025
The tribunal granted the landlord unconditional dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for the urgent replacement of the foul water pumps at Tradewinds, York, costing £5917.60, while leaseholders keep their right to challenge the charges under section 27A.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Tradewinds Management Limited |
| Management company | Tradewinds Management Limited |
| Managing agent | Anthem Management Limited |
| Building | A block, 23 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
containing 23 long leasehold apartments in total
- freeholder
The Applicant is Tradewinds Management Limited (“The Applicant”).
- agent
managed on behalf of the Applicants by Anthem Management Limited (“Anthem”)
- outcome
Decision: Dispensation is granted unconditionally.
- s20
Accordingly, the tribunal agrees to give dispensation unconditionally in relation to the application.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.