Towpath House, 10 Canal Road, Riddlesden, BD20 5AG
MAN/00CX/LDC/2019/0037 · dispensation from consultation · Bradford · decided 29 Oct 2019
The tribunal dispensed with the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent work to the lift at Towpath House, but did not decide whether the resulting service charges are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Towpath House Riddlesden Management Company Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 32 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising 32 Leasehold residential flats with one passenger lift
- management company
The Applicant is the Management Company named in the Respondents’
- outcome
We conclude it reasonable in accordance with Section 20ZA(1) of the Act to dispense with the consultation requirements
- s20
We conclude it reasonable in accordance with Section 20ZA(1) of the Act to dispense with the consultation requirements
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.