Tower Court/Trinity Court/Windsor Court, No 1 London Road, Newcastle-under-Lyme, ST5 1LT
BIR/41UE/LSC/2020/0005 · service charges · Newcastle-under-Lyme · decided 18 Dec 2020
The tribunal found the insurance premiums of £317,163.19 reasonably incurred and payable, and allowed the waking watch at £2,318.40 per week but only up to £67,233.60 until 31 March 2021, while deferring decisions on the fire alarm and professional fee costs.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Number One London Road Management Company Limited |
| Managing agent | Clear Building Management |
| Building | An estate · 8 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, legal and professional fees, other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | other |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- management company
an application from No 1 L0ndon Road Management Company Limited under section 24(9)
- agent
on behalf of Clear Building Management,
- years
balancing payment exercise in respect of the service charge year 2020/2021
- outcome
the Tribunal makes the following determinations
- items reduced
it would be reasonable for Mr [name] to incur costs up to £67,233.60
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.