Tower Court/Trinity Court/Windsor Court, No 1 London Road, Newcastle-under-Lyme, ST5 1LT
BIR/41UE/LLC/2022/0004 · LLC · Newcastle-under-Lyme · decided 25 May 2022
figures not yet checkedThe Tribunal ordered that the respondent's costs of the Directions application, including Counsel's fees, cannot be added to the service charge, because they were not reasonably incurred.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Number One London Road RTM Company Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block · 8 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- management company
handover of the management of the subject premises to Number One London Road RTM Company Limited (‘the RTM company’)
- outcome
it would be just and equitable to order that the costs incurred by the Respondent in connection with the proceedings before the Tribunal in relation to the Directions application are not to be regarded as relevant costs
- s20c
it would be just and equitable to order that the costs incurred by the Respondent in connection with the proceedings before the Tribunal in relation to the Directions application are not to be regarded as relevant costs to be taken into account in determining the amount of any service charge payable by the Applicants
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.