Tor Sands, Sands Road, Paignton, Devon TQ4 6EH
CHI/00HH/LDC/2023/0040 · dispensation from consultation · Torbay · decided 4 May 2023
The Tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the remaining s.20 consultation requirements for works to replace the lift drive unit at this 22-flat block, as no leaseholder objected.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Tor Sands Management Company Limited |
| Managing agent | Blenheims Estate & Asset Management (SW) Limited |
| Building | A block, 22 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- management company
Applicant : Tor Sands Management Company Limited
- agent
Representative : Blenheims Estate & Asset Management
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the remaining consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of works to replace the lift drive unit.
- s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the remaining consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of works to replace the lift drive unit.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.