Top Floor Flat, 113 Randolph Avenue, London , W9 1LD
LON/00BK/LSC/2025/0974 · service charges · Westminster · decided 20 Feb 2026
The tribunal found payable the disputed service charges of £4920.74 for 2023-2024, 2024-2025 and advance charges for 2025-2026, including audit fees, minor repairs, electricity, pest control and reserve fund expenditure, and it referred the remaining ground rent and county court costs issues back to the county court.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, legal and professional fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | £4,920.74 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a converted house consisting of 4 flats
- years
service charge years 2022 - 2023, 2023-2024, 2024-2025 and advance charges 2025-2026
- outcome
The tribunal determines that the sum of £4920.74 is payable by the Respondent in respect of the service charges for the years 2023-2024, 2024-2025 and advance charges 2025-2026.
- total payable
the sum of £4920.74 is payable by the
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.