Top Flat, 60 Mount Pleasant Road, Hastings, East Sussex TN34 3SH
CHI/21UD/LIS/2023/0005 · LIS · Hastings · decided 4 Sep 2023
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found £3,510.29 outstanding after payments, reducing several charges including roof repairs, management fees and electricity, and refused the applicant's Rule 13 costs claim while finding legal costs not recoverable through the service charge.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | HAS Property Management |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, utilities |
| Total demanded | £4,512.52 |
| Total found payable | £4,247.35 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- agent
based on demands raised by the managing agent HAS Property Management.
- years
for the years 2015 – 2021 inclusive
- outcome
The Tribunal adjusts this in respect of the reduction in roof repair charges to 10% of £507.25
- items reduced
The Tribunal adjusts this in respect of the reduction in roof repair charges
- total demanded
The application form refers to the total value of the dispute as some £4,512.52.
- total payable
Grand Total £4,247.35
- s20
Of the £350 cost of roof repairs which exceeded the S.20 limit £250 is admitted.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.