Thomas Bewick House, Thomas Bewick Street, Newcastle- upon-Tyne, NE1 5EJ
MAN/00CJ/LDC/2021/0087 · dispensation from consultation · Newcastle upon Tyne · decided 11 Nov 2022
figures not yet checkedNo plain-English summary for this decision yet. See the original.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | UK Ground Rent Estates (2) Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Kingston Property Services Limited |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property is a seven storey building containing eighteen apartments and one commercial unit.
- freeholder
Applicant : UK Ground Rent Estates (2) Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that compliance with the consultation requirements of
- s20c
The Tribunal does not make an order under s.20C of the Act or under paragraph
- s20
The Tribunal finds that it is reasonable for the works to proceed without the
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.