Third Floor Flat, 78 Cornwall Gardens, London, SW7 4AZ
LON/00AW/LSC/2021/0422 · service charges · Kensington and Chelsea · decided 8 Nov 2022
The tribunal found that the landlord had wrongly applied the old 1963 lease apportionment, but the leaseholder was estopped by acquiescence from challenging the 2006 to 2019 service charge proportions, so her application was dismissed.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Lysville Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | OCK Chartered Surveyors |
| Building | One flat, 7 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £19,592.44 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
one of 7 flats in a Georgian white stucco building on a garden square in South Kensington
- freeholder
Respondent : Lysville Ltd
- agent
Ms [name] (an accounts Manager with OCK Chartered Surveyors, the Managing Agents for the Respondent)
- years
The Applicant's remaining application is therefore for the years 2006 – 2019 inclusive
- outcome
The Applicant is estopped from challenging the fair and proper proportion of the service charge attributable to Third Floor Flat, 78 Cornwall Gardens, London, SW7 4AZ for the years 2006 – 2019.
- total demanded
the total sum in issue is therefore £19,592.44
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.