The Water Gardens, Burwood Place, London W2 2DA
LON/00BK/LSC/2019/0126 · service charges · Westminster · decided 12 Aug 2019
The tribunal found the £168,282 of legal costs reasonably incurred and payable by the lessees other than those covered by an earlier application, made no section 20C order, and refused a late request to join two more lessees.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | England Charles Russell Speechlys LLP |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 251 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2013, 2015 |
| Items in dispute | legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £168,282 |
| Total found payable | £168,282 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The subject property is a block of flats containing 251 flats.
- outcome
The costs of £168,282 which are the subject of this application have been reasonably incurred and the resulting service charges are payable by the Applicants
- total demanded
The costs of £168,282 which are the subject of this application
- total payable
The costs of £168,282 which are the subject of this application have been reasonably incurred
- s20c
There shall be no order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of the current proceedings.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.