Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near TQ8 8JG

The Salcombe, Fore Street, Salcombe, Devon TQ8 8JG

HAV/18UG/LDC/2025/0661 · dispensation from consultation · South Hams · decided 14 Jul 2025

The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for emergency repairs to the sea wall at The Salcombe, but made no decision on whether the costs are payable.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordThe Salcombe Company Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 36 flats · 2 decisions about this building
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
The Salcombe is a block of 36 apartments of different sizes
freeholder
Applicant : The Salcombe Company Limited
outcome
The Tribunal determines that dispensation is granted under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 for emergency repair works to the sea wall required to prevent its collapse.
s20
dispensation from the consultation requirements in Section 20 of the Act is granted.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.