The Ridgeway, 32 Broadwater Down, Tunbridge Wells, Kent, TN2 5NX
HAV/29UQ/LDC/2025/0647 · dispensation from consultation · Tunbridge Wells · decided 2 Jun 2025
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent works to replace the faulty lift drive unit, but made no decision on whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Broadwater House Management Limited |
| Management company | Broadwater House Management Limited |
| Managing agent | Burkinshaw Block Management |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | major works |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The property comprises eleven flats.
- freeholder
Applicant : Broadwater House Management Limited
- agent
On 28 May 2025, Burkinshaw Block Management, on behalf of the Applicant, confirmed
- outcome
The Applicant is granted dispensation under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The Applicant is granted dispensation under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 from the consultation requirements
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.