The Point Building, 14 Plumptre Street, Nottingham, NG1 1JP
BIR/00FY/LDC/2021/0020 · dispensation from consultation · Nottingham · decided 10 Nov 2021
The tribunal granted the applicant RTM company dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for remedial works to remove unsafe cladding at The Point Building, finding no real prejudice to the leaseholders.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Proxima GR Properties Limited |
| Management company | The Point Building RTM Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 39 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising 39 residential apartments
- freeholder
Respondent 2. : Proxima GR Properties Limited
- management company
The Applicant is The Point Building RTM Limited.
- outcome
the Tribunal is satisfied it is reasonable to dispense with the consultation requirements of s20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of work described in the application.
- s20
Accordingly, the Tribunal grants the dispensation requested under Section 20ZA and determines accordingly.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.