The Old Telephone Exchange, 20 Liverpool Grove, London, SE17 2PY
LON/00BE/LSC/2023/0166 · service charges · Southwark · decided 10 Jul 2023
The tribunal found that the lease allows the management company to accumulate a reserve fund for future recurring expenditure, so the contested charges are reasonable and payable, and the respondent must reimburse the £100 application fee.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 14 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 |
| Items in dispute | reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to reimburse application fee £100 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
converted into 14 flats let on long leases
- years
service charge years 2017 to 2023
- outcome
I find that the contested charges are reasonable and payable.
- costs
I order that the Respondents reimburse the Applicant’s application fee of £100.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.