The Old Tannery, Clyde Street, Bingley West Yorkshire BD16 4JJ
MAN/00CX/LDC/2020/0006 · dispensation from consultation · Bradford · decided 27 Mar 2020
The tribunal dispensed with the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent roof and associated repair works at The Old Tannery, but did not decide whether the resulting service charges are payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | The Tannery RTM Company Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 27 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
There are 27 apartments
- management company
The Tannery RTM Company Limited applies to the Tribunal under Section 20ZA
- outcome
We conclude it reasonable in accordance with Section 20ZA(1) of the Act to dispense with the consultation requirements
- s20
The Applicant is dispensed from complying with the consultation requirements in respect of the work specified in the application.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.