The Morehall, 284 Cheriton Road, Folkestone CT19 4DW
HAV/29UL/LDC/2025/0695 · dispensation from consultation · Folkestone and Hythe · decided 17 Sep 2025
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent timber replacement works to the front elevation, conditional on sending a copy of the decision to all leaseholders, but made no finding on whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | The Morehall Management Company Ltd |
| Management company | The Morehall Management Company Ltd |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 8 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
A converted property housing eight self-contained residential flats.
- freeholder
Applicant : The Morehall Management Company Ltd
- outcome
The Applicant is granted dispensation under Section 20ZA of
- s20
The Applicant is granted dispensation under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 from the consultation requirements imposed on the landlord by Section 20 of the 1985 Act
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.