The Library Building, 2a St Luke’s Avenue, Clapham, London SW4 7EA
LON/00AY/LDC/2021/0047 · dispensation from consultation · Lambeth · decided 20 Apr 2021
The tribunal granted the freeholder dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for fire door, fire risk assessment and EWS1 certificate works at The Library Building, though this does not decide whether the costs are payable or reasonable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Clapham One Ground Rents Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 136 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a development of 136 residential apartments of 1,2 and 3 bedroom properties
- freeholder
Applicant: Clapham One Ground Rents Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the application for dispensation from statutory consultation in respect of the subject works
- s20
The Tribunal grants the application for dispensation from statutory consultation in respect of the subject works
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.