The Lansbury, 19 Basil Street, London, SW3 1BA
LON/00AW/LDC/2021/0290 · dispensation from consultation · Kensington and Chelsea · decided 28 Feb 2022
The tribunal granted the managing agents dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent works to remedy dampness and foul smells from the drainage system affecting one flat.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Rhodium 45 Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Rhodium 45 Ltd |
| Building | A block, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
purpose built block of 6 super prime apartments
- agent
A written application was made by Rhodium 45 Ltd, the managing agents of the property.
- outcome
The tribunal exercises its discretion to grant dispensation from the consultation requirements of s20ZA in respect of the works required to remedy dampness and smells emanating from the foul drainage system and affecting one of the flats.
- s20
The tribunal exercises its discretion to grant dispensation from the consultation requirements of s20ZA
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.