(The Heron) Milton Court, Moor Lane, London, EC2Y 9BN
LON/00AA/LDC/2024/0251 · dispensation from consultation · City of London · decided 20 Jan 2025
The tribunal granted the landlord retrospective dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for emergency works to replace a failed busbar joint pack at The Heron, Milton Court, with no leaseholder prejudice found, but made no decision on whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Abacus Land 1 (Hold Co 1) Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 285 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2023 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £68,734.45 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
there are 285 residential apartments
- years
on 19 July 2023, the concierge of the premises received telephone calls
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the application for retrospective dispensation from statutory consultation
- total demanded
the total cost of the works amounts to £68,734.45
- s20
The Tribunal is therefore satisfied that it is reasonable to grant unconditional retrospective dispensation from the consultation requirements of s.20
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.