The Guinness Partnership Ltd 17,055 properties in various regions
LON/00AG/LDC/2019/0101 · dispensation from consultation · Camden · decided 19 Aug 2019
The tribunal granted dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for the applicants' proposed bulk electricity and gas supply contracts for 1 October 2019 to 30 September 2023.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | An estate |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019 |
| Items in dispute | utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
The Guinness Partnership Ltd (1)
- years
for an initial period of four years from 1 October 2019 to 30 September 2023
- outcome
the Tribunal determines, pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, that it is reasonable in all the circumstances to dispense with the statutory consultation requirements
- s20
the Tribunal determines, pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, that it is reasonable in all the circumstances to dispense with the statutory consultation requirements
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.