Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near CT20 2LR

The Grand, The Leas, Folkestone, Kent CT20 2LR

CHI/29UL/LAM/2019/0017 · appointment of a manager · Folkestone and Hythe · decided 29 May 2020

figures not yet checked

The tribunal-appointed manager was given directions under the 2018 management order to revoke landlord consents for short-term lets, paid guided tours and public use of the residential passageway, and the respondents must provide copies of licences and consents.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordHallam Estates Ltd
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 64 flats · 3 decisions about this building
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputeinsurance, major works, repairs and maintenance, legal and professional fees
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
includes some 64 residential flats (or “suites”) and commercial premises
freeholder
The First Respondent, who is the registered freehold proprietor of the premises

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.